You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
杉田浩崇・熊井将太編 「エビデンスに基づく教育」の閾を探る-教育学における規範と事実をめぐって-』
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Journal of Educational Methods, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.18971/nasemjournal.45.0_124 |
| Authors |
亘理 陽一 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2022.
All research outputs
#16,376,857
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Research Journal of Educational Methods
#8
of 25 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,729
of 457,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Journal of Educational Methods
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one scored the same or higher as 17 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.