↓ Skip to main content

Si:P as a laboratory analogue for hydrogen on high magnetic field white dwarf stars

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Si:P as a laboratory analogue for hydrogen on high magnetic field white dwarf stars
Published in
Nature Communications, February 2013
DOI 10.1038/ncomms2466
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Laboratory spectroscopy of atomic hydrogen in a magnetic flux density of 10(5) T (1 gigagauss), the maximum observed on high-field magnetic white dwarfs, is impossible because practically available fields are about a thousand times less. In this regime, the cyclotron and binding energies become equal. Here we demonstrate Lyman series spectra for phosphorus impurities in silicon up to the equivalent field, which is scaled to 32.8 T by the effective mass and dielectric constant. The spectra reproduce the high-field theory for free hydrogen, with quadratic Zeeman splitting and strong mixing of spherical harmonics. They show the way for experiments on He and H(2) analogues, and for investigation of He(2), a bound molecule predicted under extreme field conditions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 4%
United States 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
India 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 69 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 26%
Researcher 17 22%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 49 64%
Chemistry 9 12%
Engineering 2 3%
Mathematics 1 1%
Materials Science 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2017.
All research outputs
#10,337,147
of 32,106,825 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#58,490
of 77,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,270
of 335,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#196
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,106,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77,360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.