You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
How Should Clinical Wound Care and Management Translate to Effective Engineering Standard Testing Requirements from Foam Dressings? Mapping the Existing Gaps and Needs
|
---|---|
Published in |
Advances in Wound Care, April 2022
|
DOI | 10.1089/wound.2021.0173 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amit Gefen, Paulo Alves, Dimitri Beeckman, Breda Cullen, José Luis Lázaro-Martínez, Hadar Lev-Tov, Bijan Najafi, Nick Santamaria, Andrew Sharpe, Terry Swanson, Kevin Woo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 25% |
Belgium | 3 | 13% |
United States | 2 | 8% |
Spain | 2 | 8% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
India | 1 | 4% |
Sweden | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 20 | 83% |
Scientists | 4 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 7 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
Professor | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 22 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 7 | 16% |
Engineering | 4 | 9% |
Materials Science | 4 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 22 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,178,704
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Wound Care
#58
of 403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,911
of 450,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Wound Care
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 403 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.