↓ Skip to main content

Impaired Recognition of Social Emotions following Amygdala Damage

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, November 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
640 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Impaired Recognition of Social Emotions following Amygdala Damage
Published in
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, November 2002
DOI 10.1162/089892902760807258
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Lesion, functional imaging, and single-unit studies in human and nonhuman animals have demonstrated a role for the amygdala in processing stimuli with emotional and social significance. We investigated the recognition of a wide variety of facial expressions, including basic emotions (e.g., happiness, anger) and social emotions (e.g., guilt, admiration, flirtatiousness). Prior findings with a standardized set of stimuli indicated that recognition of social emotions can be signaled by the eye region of the face and is disproportionately impaired in autism (Baron-Cohen, Wheelwright, & Jolliffe, 1997). To test the hypothesis that the recognition of social emotions depends on the amygdala, we administered the same stimuli to 30 subjects with unilateral amygdala damage (16 left, 14 right), 2 with bilateral amygdala damage, 47 brain-damaged controls, and 19 normal controls. Compared with controls, subjects with unilateral or bilateral amygdala damage were impaired when recognizing social emotions; moreover, they were more impaired in recognition of social emotions than in recognition of basic emotions, and, like previously described patients with autism, they were impaired also when asked to recognize social emotions from the eye region of the face alone. The findings suggest that the human amygdala is relatively specialized to process stimuli with complex social significance. The results also provide further support for the idea that some of the impairments in social cognition seen in patients with autism may result from dysfunction of the amygdala.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 640 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 12 2%
United Kingdom 7 1%
France 4 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
Other 9 1%
Unknown 592 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 123 19%
Researcher 108 17%
Student > Master 68 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 55 9%
Student > Bachelor 55 9%
Other 133 21%
Unknown 98 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 305 48%
Neuroscience 58 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 45 7%
Social Sciences 18 3%
Other 42 7%
Unknown 121 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2014.
All research outputs
#7,383,495
of 33,949,960 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
#801
of 2,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,839
of 77,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,949,960 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.