↓ Skip to main content

Tick magnets: The occupational risk of tick‐borne disease exposure in forestry workers in New York

Overview of attention for article published in HEALTH SCIENCE REPORTS, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Tick magnets: The occupational risk of tick‐borne disease exposure in forestry workers in New York
Published in
HEALTH SCIENCE REPORTS, February 2022
DOI 10.1002/hsr2.509
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Lecturer 1 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 21 68%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 21 68%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,509,944
of 34,139,790 outputs
Outputs from HEALTH SCIENCE REPORTS
#362
of 1,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,888
of 479,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HEALTH SCIENCE REPORTS
#17
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,139,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.