You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A novel application of hierarchical modelling to decouple sampling artifacts from socio-ecological effects on poaching intensity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109488 |
| Authors |
Mahmood Soofi, Ali T. Qashqaei, Jan-Niklas Trei, Shirko Shokri, Javad Selyari, Benjamin Ghasemi, Pooriya Sepahvand, Lukas Egli, Bagher Nezami, Navid Zamani, Gholam Hosein Yusefi, Bahram H. Kiabi, Niko Balkenhol, Andrew Royle, Chris R. Pavey, Steve M. Redpath, Matthias Waltert |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 21% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 21% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2022.
All research outputs
#14,270,452
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#5,410
of 6,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,305
of 449,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#47
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.