You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Factional Model-making in China: Party Elites’ Open Political Contention in the Policy Process
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
China Quarterly, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s030574102200008x |
| Authors |
Olivia Cheung |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 22% |
| United States | 4 | 11% |
| Hong Kong | 3 | 8% |
| China | 2 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 84% |
| Scientists | 5 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 27% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 4 | 27% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 7% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,472,469
of 25,478,886 outputs
Outputs from China Quarterly
#109
of 1,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,990
of 448,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from China Quarterly
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,478,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.