↓ Skip to main content

The impact of CT colonography on abdominal aortic aneurysm referrals in a tertiary hospital

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Oncology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The impact of CT colonography on abdominal aortic aneurysm referrals in a tertiary hospital
Published in
Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Oncology, September 2016
DOI 10.1111/1754-9485.12535
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Computed tomography colonography (CTC) for the detection of colorectal disease is gaining popularity as an alternative to colonoscopy. This has been associated with an increase in incidental extra-colonic findings such as abdominal aortic aneurysms. However, due to the patient selection process of obtaining a CTC, it was hypothesised that this patient cohort might represent a high-risk group. The primary aim of this study was to determine the impact that CTC had on small aneurysm referrals. Owing to the potential selection bias, the secondary aim was to compare baseline characteristics referred by CTC to the cohort referred by other radiological modalities. Consecutive patients attending the small aneurysm clinic at a single tertiary centre were included. Baseline patient comorbidities were collected and recorded on a prospective database. The characteristics of patients who had a CTC-detected aneurysm were compared to patients referred by other radiological modalities. There were 566 patients with small aneurysms included. Of these, 96 (17.0%) had their aneurysm detected from CTC and the remaining aneurysms were detected by other radiological modalities. These patients were on average 2 years older and were less likely to have a smoking history. There was no difference in other patient characteristics. Computed tomography colonography contributed to the initial diagnosis of one in five patients with small aneurysms. Despite a potential selection bias for patients undergoing CTC, there were no major baseline differences between the CTC cohort and patients referred by other radiological modalities. Routine assessment of the aorta during a CTC may aid in aneurysm detection.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 24%
Student > Master 4 19%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Researcher 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 7 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 11 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2016.
All research outputs
#6,776,538
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Oncology
#167
of 1,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,234
of 333,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Oncology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,184 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.