↓ Skip to main content

Numerical simulation of magmatic hydrothermal systems

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews of Geophysics, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
152 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Numerical simulation of magmatic hydrothermal systems
Published in
Reviews of Geophysics, March 2010
DOI 10.1029/2009rg000287
Authors

S. E. Ingebritsen, S. Geiger, S. Hurwitz, T. Driesner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Canada 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 211 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 26%
Researcher 53 23%
Student > Master 27 12%
Professor 13 6%
Other 12 5%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 29 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 137 60%
Engineering 14 6%
Physics and Astronomy 6 3%
Energy 5 2%
Environmental Science 5 2%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 48 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2014.
All research outputs
#14,599,159
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Reviews of Geophysics
#637
of 751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,276
of 103,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews of Geophysics
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.