↓ Skip to main content

Sourcing obsidian: a new optimized LA-ICP-MS protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Science and Technology of Archaeological Research, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sourcing obsidian: a new optimized LA-ICP-MS protocol
Published in
Science and Technology of Archaeological Research, October 2016
DOI 10.1080/20548923.2016.1236516
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 35%
Professor 3 15%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 4 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 25%
Arts and Humanities 4 20%
Social Sciences 3 15%
Materials Science 2 10%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2020.
All research outputs
#22,574,132
of 33,949,960 outputs
Outputs from Science and Technology of Archaeological Research
#43
of 74 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,311
of 336,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science and Technology of Archaeological Research
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,949,960 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 74 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.