You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
放射性核種の摂取量の評価方法 Ⅲ.モンテカルロ法等を用いた摂取量算定
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan / Atomic Energy Society of Japan, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3327/jaesjb.63.5_399 |
| Authors |
岩井 敏, 熊澤 蕃, 石田 健二, 高木 俊治, 猪狩 貴史, 早川 信博 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2022.
All research outputs
#17,297,846
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan / Atomic Energy Society of Japan
#148
of 223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#325,046
of 519,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan / Atomic Energy Society of Japan
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.