↓ Skip to main content

Challenges of sampling and how phylogenetic comparative methods help: with a case study of the Pama-Nyungan laminal contrast

Overview of attention for article published in Linguistic Typology, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 181)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Challenges of sampling and how phylogenetic comparative methods help: with a case study of the Pama-Nyungan laminal contrast
Published in
Linguistic Typology, February 2022
DOI 10.1515/lingty-2021-0025
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 9%
Linguistics 1 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Psychology 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2022.
All research outputs
#8,289,602
of 31,525,461 outputs
Outputs from Linguistic Typology
#39
of 181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,043
of 464,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Linguistic Typology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,525,461 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 464,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them