| Title |
Monitoring the capacity of working memory: Executive control and effects of listening effort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Memory & Cognition, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3758/s13421-013-0302-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicole M. Amichetti, Raymond S. Stanley, Alison G. White, Arthur Wingfield |
| Abstract |
In two experiments, we used an interruption-and-recall (IAR) task to explore listeners' ability to monitor the capacity of working memory as new information arrived in real time. In this task, listeners heard recorded word lists with instructions to interrupt the input at the maximum point that would still allow for perfect recall. Experiment 1 demonstrated that the most commonly selected segment size closely matched participants' memory span, as measured in a baseline span test. Experiment 2 showed that reducing the sound level of presented word lists to a suprathreshold but effortful listening level disrupted the accuracy of matching selected segment sizes with participants' memory spans. The results are discussed in terms of whether online capacity monitoring may be subsumed under other, already enumerated working memory executive functions (inhibition, set shifting, and memory updating). |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 19% |
| Unknown | 27 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 30 | 27% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 7% |
| Linguistics | 7 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 33 | 29% |