↓ Skip to main content

The acute and long-term effects of dietary fatty acids on vascular function in health and disease

Overview of attention for article published in Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The acute and long-term effects of dietary fatty acids on vascular function in health and disease
Published in
Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, March 2013
DOI 10.1097/mco.0b013e32835c5f29
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Vascular function is recognized as an early and integrative marker of cardiovascular disease. While there is consistent evidence that the quantity of dietary fat has significant effects on vascular function, the differential effects of individual fatty acids is less clear. This review summarizes recent evidence from randomly controlled dietary studies on the impact of dietary fatty acids on vascular function, as determined by flow-mediated dilatation (FMD).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 23%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2013.
All research outputs
#9,019,465
of 27,356,215 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care
#713
of 1,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,533
of 211,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,356,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.