↓ Skip to main content

Editorial Comment: Imaging of Pediatric Chronic Pancreatitis Requires Standardized Interpretation Criteria.

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Roentgenology, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Editorial Comment: Imaging of Pediatric Chronic Pancreatitis Requires Standardized Interpretation Criteria.
Published in
American Journal of Roentgenology, March 2022
DOI 10.2214/ajr.22.27579
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,096,386
of 34,383,983 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Roentgenology
#2,625
of 11,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,159
of 476,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Roentgenology
#41
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,383,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.