↓ Skip to main content

Assessing electronic interruptions experienced by an anesthesiology clinical director

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Assessing electronic interruptions experienced by an anesthesiology clinical director
Published in
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, August 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.07.004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the workflow interruptions on an anesthesiology clinical director (CD). By assessing the interruptions on the CD, we hypothesize that these frequent interruptions would prohibit the CD from medical direction of residents or certified nurse anesthetists in operating rooms. Cellular phone data were obtained from Verizon Wireless statements over 10 months, August 2012 through May 2013. These data were from a single cellular phone carried by the anesthesia CD and subsequent overnight anesthesiologist 24 hours a day. The data obtained from the billing records included number of calls, date and time call occurred, number of minutes per call, and number of texts received. These calls occurred in the operating room. Not applicable. Not applicable. Phone calls, texts, and pager interruptions. A total of 19,924 calls and 19,803 texts were received by the CD. The phone calls minutes for this period were 31,236 minutes. A total of 15,831 (80%) of the calls occurred during this period (0600-1800). A total of 24 489 minutes (78%) of the total minutes occurred during this time. This study revealed that distracting events are frequent for an anesthesiology CD. The quantity of cellular phone interruptions, both calls and texts, by the anesthesiology CD was considered high. These calls occurred mainly during prime operating room time and utilization. As the CD is an integral part of the perioperative management team, they are expected to answer and return calls and texts promptly. Operating room efficiency and staff satisfaction decline if responses to these calls and texts are delayed. Although the nature of these distractions and interruptions can be viewed as having a positive or negative effect, many of these events are necessary to efficiently run the operating rooms.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 2 6%
Other 9 25%
Unknown 10 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Psychology 3 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 10 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2016.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
#1,018
of 1,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,252
of 381,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
#20
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,861 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.