↓ Skip to main content

Experimental evolution recapitulates natural evolution

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, November 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
facebook
9 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Experimental evolution recapitulates natural evolution
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, November 2000
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2000.0731
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Genomes of the closely related bacteriophages phiX174 and S13 are 5386 bases long and differ at 114 nucleotides, affecting 28 amino acids. Both parental phages were adapted to laboratory culture conditions in replicate lineages and analysed for nucleotide changes that accumulated experimentally Of the 126 experimental substitutions, 90% encoded amino-acid changes, and 62% of the substitutions occurred in parallel in more than one experimental line. Furthermore, missense changes at 12 of the experimental sites were at residues differing between the parental phages; in ten cases the phiX174 experimental lineages were convergent with the S13 parent, or vice versa, at both the nucleotide and amino-acid levels. Convergence at a site was even obtained in both directions in three cases. These results point to a limited number of pathways taken during evolution in these viruses, and also raise the possibility that much of the amino-acid variation in the natural evolution of these viruses has been selected.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Norway 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 97 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 20%
Researcher 20 18%
Professor 13 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 22 20%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 16 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2016.
All research outputs
#9,459,488
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#4,372
of 7,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,437
of 162,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#14
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.