↓ Skip to main content

Synthesis, characterization and modification of Gum Arabic microgels for hemocompatibility and antimicrobial studies

Overview of attention for article published in Carbohydrate Polymers, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Synthesis, characterization and modification of Gum Arabic microgels for hemocompatibility and antimicrobial studies
Published in
Carbohydrate Polymers, September 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.09.052
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Gum Arabic (GA) microgels were successfully prepared via reverse micellization method with high yield (78.5±5.0%) in 5-100μm size range using divinyl sulfone (DVS) as a crosslinker. The GA microgels were degraded hydrolytically 22.8±3.5% at pH 1 in 20days, whereas no degradation was observed at pH 7.4 and pH 9 at 37°C. By using diethylenetriamine (DETA), and taurine (TA) as chemical modifying agents, GA microgels were chemically modified as GA-DETA and GA-TA, and the zeta potential values of 5.2±4.1 and -24.8±1.3mV were measured, respectively in comparison to -27.3±4.2mV for GA. Moreover, blood compatibility of GA, GA-TA, and GA-DETA microgels was tested via in vitro protein adsorption, % hemolysis ratio, and blood clotting index. All the microgels were hemocompatible with% hemolysis ratio between 0.23 to 2.05, and the GA microgels were found to be highly compatible with a blood clotting index of 81±40. The biocompatibility of GA, GA-DETA and GA-Taurine microgels against L929 fibroblast cells also revealed 84.4, 89.1, and 67.0% cell viability, respectively, at 25.0μg/mL concentration, suggesting great potential in vivo biomedical applications up to this concentration. In addition, 5 and 10mg/mL minimum inhibition concentrations of protonated GA-DETA microgels (GA-DETA-HCl) were determined against E. coli and S. aureus, respectively.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 16%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 29 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 12 15%
Engineering 6 7%
Chemical Engineering 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 36 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Carbohydrate Polymers
#4,341
of 5,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#277,425
of 315,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carbohydrate Polymers
#61
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.