↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Farm Animal Contact as Risk Factor for Transmission of Bovine-associated Salmonella Subtypes - Volume 18, Number 12—December 2012 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC
Published in
Emerging Infectious Diseases, December 2012
DOI 10.3201/eid1812.110831
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin J. Cummings, Lorin D. Warnick, Margaret A. Davis, Kaye Eckmann, Yrjö T. Gröhn, Karin Hoelzer, Kathryn MacDonald, Timothy P. Root, Julie D. Siler, Suzanne M. McGuire, Martin Wiedmann, Emily M. Wright, Shelley M. Zansky, Thomas E. Besser, Kevin J. Cummings, Lorin D. Warnick, Margaret A. Davis, Kaye Eckmann, Yrjö T. Gröhn, Karin Hoelzer, Kathryn MacDonald, Timothy P. Root, Julie D. Siler, Suzanne M. McGuire, Martin Wiedmann, Emily M. Wright, Shelley M. Zansky, Thomas E. Besser, Kevin J. Cummings, Lorin D. Warnick, Margaret A. Davis, Kaye Eckmann, Yrjö T. Gröhn, Karin Hoelzer, Kathryn MacDonald, Timothy P. Root, Julie D. Siler, Suzanne M. McGuire, Martin Wiedmann, Emily M. Wright, Shelley M. Zansky, Thomas E. Besser

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Unknown 74 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 19 25%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 17 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 21 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,521,810
of 31,943,232 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#4,494
of 10,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,092
of 327,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#40
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,943,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.