| Title |
Animal diversity and ecosystem functioning in dynamic food webs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ncomms12718 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
Species diversity is changing globally and locally, but the complexity of ecological communities hampers a general understanding of the consequences of animal species loss on ecosystem functioning. High animal diversity increases complementarity of herbivores but also increases feeding rates within the consumer guild. Depending on the balance of these counteracting mechanisms, species-rich animal communities may put plants under top-down control or may release them from grazing pressure. Using a dynamic food-web model with body-mass constraints, we simulate ecosystem functions of 20,000 communities of varying animal diversity. We show that diverse animal communities accumulate more biomass and are more exploitative on plants, despite their higher rates of intra-guild predation. However, they do not reduce plant biomass because the communities are composed of larger, and thus energetically more efficient, plant and animal species. This plasticity of community body-size structure reconciles the debate on the consequences of animal species loss for primary productivity. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 14% |
| Germany | 3 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 5% |
| Portugal | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 5% |
| Greece | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 62% |
| Scientists | 8 | 38% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Réunion | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 274 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 19% |
| Researcher | 45 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 10% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 12% |
| Unknown | 68 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 98 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 65 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Unknown | 79 | 29% |