↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Meta-Analysis of Thyroid-Related Traits Reveals Novel Loci and Gender-Specific Differences in the Regulation of Thyroid Function
Published in
PLoS Genetics, February 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003266
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eleonora Porcu, Marco Medici, Giorgio Pistis, Claudia B. Volpato, Scott G. Wilson, Anne R. Cappola, Steffan D. Bos, Joris Deelen, Martin den Heijer, Rachel M. Freathy, Jari Lahti, Chunyu Liu, Lorna M. Lopez, Ilja M. Nolte, Jeffrey R. O'Connell, Toshiko Tanaka, Stella Trompet, Alice Arnold, Stefania Bandinelli, Marian Beekman, Stefan Böhringer, Suzanne J. Brown, Brendan M. Buckley, Clara Camaschella, Anton J. M. de Craen, Gail Davies, Marieke C. H. de Visser, Ian Ford, Tom Forsen, Timothy M. Frayling, Laura Fugazzola, Martin Gögele, Andrew T. Hattersley, Ad R. Hermus, Albert Hofman, Jeanine J. Houwing-Duistermaat, Richard A. Jensen, Eero Kajantie, Margreet Kloppenburg, Ee M. Lim, Corrado Masciullo, Stefano Mariotti, Cosetta Minelli, Braxton D. Mitchell, Ramaiah Nagaraja, Romana T. Netea-Maier, Aarno Palotie, Luca Persani, Maria G. Piras, Bruce M. Psaty, Katri Räikkönen, J. Brent Richards, Fernando Rivadeneira, Cinzia Sala, Mona M. Sabra, Naveed Sattar, Beverley M. Shields, Nicole Soranzo, John M. Starr, David J. Stott, Fred C. G. J. Sweep, Gianluca Usala, Melanie M. van der Klauw, Diana van Heemst, Alies van Mullem, Sita H.Vermeulen, W. Edward Visser, John P. Walsh, Rudi G. J. Westendorp, Elisabeth Widen, Guangju Zhai, Francesco Cucca, Ian J. Deary, Johan G. Eriksson, Luigi Ferrucci, Caroline S. Fox, J. Wouter Jukema, Lambertus A. Kiemeney, Peter P. Pramstaller, David Schlessinger, Alan R. Shuldiner, Eline P. Slagboom, André G. Uitterlinden, Bijay Vaidya, Theo J. Visser, Bruce H. R. Wolffenbuttel, Ingrid Meulenbelt, Jerome I. Rotter, Tim D. Spector, Andrew A. Hicks, Daniela Toniolo, Serena Sanna, Robin P. Peeters, Silvia Naitza

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 205 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 15%
Student > Master 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Professor 13 6%
Other 38 18%
Unknown 55 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 15%
Computer Science 6 3%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 63 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2025.
All research outputs
#2,336,301
of 34,115,020 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#1,439
of 9,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,567
of 345,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#19
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,115,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.