↓ Skip to main content

Fairness of Selections in the Discourses on “Lottery” in the Discussion regarding the Reform of Entrance Examinations for Middle Schools in Japan in the 1920ʼs

Overview of attention for article published in Kyoiku-shakaigaku Kenkyu, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fairness of Selections in the Discourses on “Lottery” in the Discussion regarding the Reform of Entrance Examinations for Middle Schools in Japan in the 1920ʼs
Published in
Kyoiku-shakaigaku Kenkyu, January 2014
DOI 10.11151/eds.94.173
Authors

Manabu ISHIOKA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2022.
All research outputs
#16,375,964
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Kyoiku-shakaigaku Kenkyu
#109
of 259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,500
of 321,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kyoiku-shakaigaku Kenkyu
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 259 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.