↓ Skip to main content

A disposable breath sensing tube with on-tube single-nanowire sensor array for on-site detection of exhaled breath biomarkers

Overview of attention for article published in Lab on a Chip - Miniaturisation for Chemistry & Biology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A disposable breath sensing tube with on-tube single-nanowire sensor array for on-site detection of exhaled breath biomarkers
Published in
Lab on a Chip - Miniaturisation for Chemistry & Biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1039/c6lc01157h
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This paper presents a novel disposable breath-sensing tube with an on-tube single-nanowire (NW) sensor array for noninvasive, simple, and on-site detection of exhaled breath biomarkers. Although various noninvasive detection methods for lung cancer biomarkers in breath samples exist, they are unsuitable for self-diagnostics and immediate detection because they entail complicated handling procedures and are time intensive. In this study, we simulated, fabricated, and characterized disposable nanosensors by using single TiO2 and Ag NWs in flexible plastic tubes. The proposed sensors simultaneously detect 2-propyl-1-pentanol (2-PP) lung cancer biomarkers and changes in the humidity, flow rate, and temperature of the flowing gas. The optimal dimension of the tubes was determined and verified through dynamic simulations and experiments. The current tube design decreases sensing variation and moisture interference by 43.28% and 78.77%, respectively, compared with previous designs. In the future, the proposed breath sensor, which has a response time of less than 10 s, can be used in a tube for simple and quick screening of lung cancer patients with the 2-PP concentration exceeding 100 ppb. The developed breath-sensing platform can be applied in noninvasive on-site disease screening.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 11 24%
Materials Science 9 20%
Chemistry 6 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Energy 2 4%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 8 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2018.
All research outputs
#24,753,303
of 34,360,257 outputs
Outputs from Lab on a Chip - Miniaturisation for Chemistry & Biology
#5,744
of 7,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,679
of 446,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lab on a Chip - Miniaturisation for Chemistry & Biology
#304
of 370 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 370 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.