↓ Skip to main content

Monomeric α-catenin links cadherin to the actin cytoskeleton

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Cell Biology, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
254 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Monomeric α-catenin links cadherin to the actin cytoskeleton
Published in
Nature Cell Biology, February 2013
DOI 10.1038/ncb2685
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The linkage of adherens junctions to the actin cytoskeleton is essential for cell adhesion. The contribution of the cadherin-catenin complex to the interaction between actin and the adherens junction remains an intensely investigated subject that centres on the function of α-catenin, which binds to cadherin through β-catenin and can bind F-actin directly or indirectly. Here, we delineate regions within Drosophila α-Catenin (α-Cat) that are important for adherens junction performance in static epithelia and dynamic morphogenetic processes. Moreover, we address whether persistent α-catenin-mediated physical linkage between cadherin and F-actin is crucial for cell adhesion and characterize the functions of α-catenin monomers and dimers at adherens junctions. Our data support the view that monomeric α-catenin acts as an essential physical linker between the cadherin-β-catenin complex and the actin cytoskeleton, whereas α-catenin dimers are cytoplasmic and form an equilibrium with monomeric junctional α-catenin.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 243 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 29%
Researcher 43 17%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Student > Master 22 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 6%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 42 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 103 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 67 26%
Engineering 10 4%
Physics and Astronomy 9 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 40 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2013.
All research outputs
#9,543,471
of 27,889,304 outputs
Outputs from Nature Cell Biology
#3,060
of 4,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,148
of 210,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Cell Biology
#22
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,889,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.