↓ Skip to main content

Primary repair of obstetric uterine rupture can be safely undertaken by non‐specialist clinicians in rural Ethiopia: a case series of 386 women

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Primary repair of obstetric uterine rupture can be safely undertaken by non‐specialist clinicians in rural Ethiopia: a case series of 386 women
Published in
British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, December 2012
DOI 10.1111/1471-0528.12098
Pubmed ID
Authors

W Alemayehu, K Ballard, J Wright

Abstract

We report 386 consecutive cases of uterine rupture over a 10-year period, revealing a case fatality rate of 4.8%, which is significantly less than the 16-37% fatality rate published in the literature. Primary uterine repair, which was carried out by non-specialised doctors in 43% of cases, was the treatment for 98% of women, and appears to be simple and effective. The main predictor of death from uterine rupture was a treatment delay of more than 12 hours from the presumed time of rupture (OR 7.7; 95% CI 1.02-58.4).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Lecturer 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 17%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2013.
All research outputs
#28,599,837
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#7,708
of 8,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,935
of 344,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#63
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.