↓ Skip to main content

Current Coding Practices and Patterns of Code Use of Registered Dietitian Nutritionists: The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics 2013 Coding Survey

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Current Coding Practices and Patterns of Code Use of Registered Dietitian Nutritionists: The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics 2013 Coding Survey
Published in
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, October 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jand.2014.07.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 11 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 15%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 13 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,848,403
of 32,831,300 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
#699
of 1,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,370
of 287,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
#15
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,831,300 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.