↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Federated Learning for Multicenter Collaboration in Ophthalmology Improving Classification Performance in Retinopathy of Prematurity
Published in
Ophthalmology Retina, March 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.oret.2022.02.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles Lu, Adam Hanif, Praveer Singh, Ken Chang, Aaron S. Coyner, James M. Brown, Susan Ostmo, Robison V. Paul Chan, Daniel Rubin, Michael F. Chiang, John Peter Campbell, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, Imaging and Informatics in Retinopathy of Prematurity Consortium Members of the Imaging and Informatics in Retinopathy of Prematurity research consortium are as follows, Michael F. Chiang, Susan Ostmo, Sang Jin Kim, Kemal Sonmez, John Peter Campbell, Robert Schelonka, Aaron Coyner, R. V. Paul Chan, Karyn Jonas, Bhavana Kolli, Jason Horowitz, Osode Coki, Cheryl-Ann Eccles, Leora Sarna, Anton Orlin, Audina Berrocal, Catherin Negron, Kimberly Denser, Kristi Cumming, Tammy Osentoski, Tammy Check, Mary Zajechowski, Thomas Lee, Aaron Nagiel, Evan Kruger, Kathryn McGovern, Dilshad Contractor, Margaret Havunjian, Charles Simmons, Raghu Murthy, Sharon Galvis, Jerome Rotter, Ida Chen, Xiaohui Li, Kent Taylor, Kaye Roll, Mary Elizabeth Hartnett, Leah Owen, Darius Moshfeghi, Mariana Nunez, Zac Wennber-Smith, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, Deniz Erdogmus, Stratis Ioannidis, Maria Ana Martinez-Castellanos, Samantha Salinas-Longoria, Rafael Romero, Andrea Arriola, Francisco Olguin-Manriquez, Miroslava Meraz-Gutierrez, Carlos M. Dulanto-Reinoso, Cristina Montero-Mendoza

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 12%
Other 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 19 56%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Computer Science 3 9%
Engineering 3 9%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 19 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2022.
All research outputs
#22,699,678
of 27,790,740 outputs
Outputs from Ophthalmology Retina
#478
of 677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#345,325
of 458,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ophthalmology Retina
#48
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,790,740 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 677 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.