You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Epigenetic activation of plasmacytoid DC drives IFNAR-dependent therapeutic differentiation of AMLImportance of host-derived type I IFN for epigenetic therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Discovery, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-1145 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica M. Salmon, Izabela Todorovski, Kym L. Stanley, Claudia Bruedigam, Conor J. Kearney, Luciano G. Martelotto, Fernando Rossello, Timothy Semple, Gisela Mir Arnau, Magnus Zethoven, Michael Bots, Stefan Bjelosevic, Leonie A. Cluse, Peter J. Fraser, Veronique Litalien, Eva Vidacs, Kate McArthur, Antony Y. Matthews, Elise Gressier, Nicole A. de Weerd, Jens Lichte, Madison J. Kelly, Simon J. Hogg, Paul J. Hertzog, Lev M. Kats, Stephin J. Vervoort, Daniel D. De Carvalho, Stefanie Scheu, Sammy Bedoui, Benjamin T. Kile, Steven W. Lane, Andrew C. Perkins, Andrew H. Wei, Pilar M. Dominguez, Ricky W. Johnstone |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 24% |
| Australia | 14 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| France | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 45% |
| Scientists | 24 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 11% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2023.
All research outputs
#699,863
of 25,623,883 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#370
of 4,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,133
of 447,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#21
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,623,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.