↓ Skip to main content

Excess Dietary Protein May Not Adversely Affect Bone 1 , 2 , 3

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nutrition, June 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Excess Dietary Protein May Not Adversely Affect Bone 1 , 2 , 3
Published in
Journal of Nutrition, June 1998
DOI 10.1093/jn/128.6.1054
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Too little protein is always harmful for the skeleton. Increasing dietary protein increases endogenous calcium excretion. The ability to adapt depends upon the adequacy of an individual's calcium intake. At a population level, the effect of protein is often minimized because calcium intake rises with increasing protein intake. A dietary calcium-to-protein ratio >/=20:1 (mg:g) probably provides adequate protection for the skeleton. Excess protein will not harm the skeleton if the calcium intake is adequate.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Slovenia 1 1%
Unknown 70 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 23%
Student > Bachelor 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Researcher 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 20%
Sports and Recreations 9 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 14 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,300,572
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nutrition
#4,737
of 12,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,552
of 48,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nutrition
#13
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.