↓ Skip to main content

Molecular pathogenesis and heterogeneity in type 3 VWD families in U.S. Zimmerman program

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thrombosis & Haemostasis, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Molecular pathogenesis and heterogeneity in type 3 VWD families in U.S. Zimmerman program
Published in
Journal of Thrombosis & Haemostasis, April 2022
DOI 10.1111/jth.15713
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pamela A. Christopherson, Sandra L. Haberichter, Veronica H. Flood, Crystal L. Perry, Brooke E. Sadler, Daniel B. Bellissimo, Jorge Di Paola, Robert R. Montgomery, the Zimmerman Program Investigators, T Abshire, H Weiler, D Lillicrap, P James, J O’Donnell, C Ng, C Bennett, R Sidonio, M Manco‐Johnson, J Journeycake, A Zia, J Lusher, M Rajpurkar, A Shapiro, S Lentz, J Gill, C Leissinger, M Ragni, M Tarantino, J Roberts, J Hord, J Strouse, A Ma, L Valentino, L Boggio, A Sharathkumar, R Gruppo, B Kerlin, R Kulkarni, D Green, K Hoots, D Brown, D Mahoney, L Mathias, A Bedros, C Diamond, A Neff, D DiMichele, P Giardina, A Cohen, M Paidas, E Werner, A Matsunaga, F Shafer, B Konkle, A Cuker, P Kouides, D Stein

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Unknown 15 88%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 14 82%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2022.
All research outputs
#11,926,893
of 34,601,305 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thrombosis & Haemostasis
#3,032
of 5,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,439
of 474,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thrombosis & Haemostasis
#40
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,601,305 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.