↓ Skip to main content

The epidemiology of Parkinson's disease: risk factors and prevention

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Neurology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge
55

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1296 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2439 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The epidemiology of Parkinson's disease: risk factors and prevention
Published in
Lancet Neurology, October 2016
DOI 10.1016/s1474-4422(16)30230-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alberto Ascherio, Michael A Schwarzschild

Abstract

Since 2006, several longitudinal studies have assessed environmental or behavioural factors that seem to modify the risk of developing Parkinson's disease. Increased risk of Parkinson's disease has been associated with exposure to pesticides, consumption of dairy products, history of melanoma, and traumatic brain injury, whereas a reduced risk has been reported in association with smoking, caffeine consumption, higher serum urate concentrations, physical activity, and use of ibuprofen and other common medications. Randomised trials are investigating the possibility that some of the negative risk factors might be neuroprotective and thus beneficial in individuals with early Parkinson's disease, particularly with respect to smoking (nicotine), caffeine, and urate. In the future, it might be possible to identify Parkinson's disease in its prodromal phase and to promote neuroprotective interventions before the onset of motor symptoms. At this time, however, the only intervention that seems justifiable for the primary prevention of Parkinson's disease is the promotion of physical activity, which is likely to be beneficial for the prevention of several chronic diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,439 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 2432 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 368 15%
Student > Master 309 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 231 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 169 7%
Researcher 167 7%
Other 315 13%
Unknown 880 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 415 17%
Neuroscience 276 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 203 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 135 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 104 4%
Other 320 13%
Unknown 986 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#798,501
of 26,060,592 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Neurology
#503
of 4,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,782
of 329,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Neurology
#4
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,060,592 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.