↓ Skip to main content

Communication: Nanoscale structure of tetradecyltrihexylphosphonium based ionic liquids

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Physics, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Communication: Nanoscale structure of tetradecyltrihexylphosphonium based ionic liquids
Published in
Journal of Chemical Physics, March 2016
DOI 10.1063/1.4944678
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In a recent communication [J. J. Hettige et al., J. Chem. Phys. 140, 111102 (2014)], we investigated the anomalous temperature dependence of the X-ray first sharp diffraction peak (or prepeak) in the tetradecyltrihexylphosphonium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)-amide ionic liquid. Contrary to what was expected and often observed, the first sharp diffraction peak in this system was shown to increase in intensity with increasing temperature. This implies higher intermediate-range periodicity at a higher temperature. Is this counter-intuitive behavior specific to the combination of cation and anion? The current work analyzes the structural behavior of the same cation coupled with six different anions ranging from the small and spherically symmetric Cl(-) to the more structurally complex and charge-diffuse NTf2 (-). In all cases, the same temperature behavior trend for the prepeak is observed independent of anionic nature. We will show that the intensity increase in the prepeak region is associated with the structural behavior of charged liquid subcomponents. Instead, upon a temperature increase, the apolar subcomponents contribute to what would be an expected decrease of prepeak intensity.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 28%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 21 49%
Chemical Engineering 6 14%
Physics and Astronomy 3 7%
Engineering 3 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 8 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2017.
All research outputs
#23,296,582
of 34,360,257 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Physics
#12,808
of 24,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,219
of 338,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Physics
#64
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,296 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.