↓ Skip to main content

Non‐Porous Iron(II)‐Based Sensor: Crystallographic Insights into a Cycle of Colorful Guest‐Induced Topotactic Transformations

Overview of attention for article published in Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Non‐Porous Iron(II)‐Based Sensor: Crystallographic Insights into a Cycle of Colorful Guest‐Induced Topotactic Transformations
Published in
Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, October 2016
DOI 10.1002/anie.201608813
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Materials capable of sensing volatile guests at room temperature by an easily monitored set of outputs are of great appeal for development as chemical sensors of small volatile organics and toxic gases. Herein the dinuclear iron(II) complex, [Fe(II)2 (L)2 (CH3 CN)4 ](BF4 )4 ⋅2 CH3 CN (1) [L=4-(4-methylphenyl)-3-(3-pyridazinyl)-5-pyridyl-4H-1,2,4-triazole], is shown to undergo reversible single-crystal-to-single-crystal (SCSC) transformations upon exposure to vapors of different guests: 1 (MeCN)⇌2 (EtOH)→3 (H2 O)⇌1 (MeCN). Whilst 1 and 2 remain dimetallic, SCSC to 3 involves conversion to a 1D polymeric chain (due to a change in L bridging mode), which, remarkably, can undergo SCSC de-polymerization, reforming dimetallic 1. Additionally, SC-XRD studies of two ordered transient forms, 1TF3 and 2TF3, confirm that guest exchange occurs by diffusion of the new guests into the non-porous lattices as the old guests leave. These reversible SCSC events also induce color and magnetic responses. Indeed dark red 1 is spin crossover active (T1/2 ↓ 356 K; T1/2 ↑ 369 K), whilst orange 2 and yellow 3 remain high spin.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 38%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 29 55%
Physics and Astronomy 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Materials Science 2 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2016.
All research outputs
#27,724,172
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#50,510
of 61,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,440
of 335,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#586
of 744 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 61,684 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 744 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.