↓ Skip to main content

Examining the use of fecal pellet morphometry to differentiate age classes in Sonoran pronghorn

Overview of attention for article published in Wildlife Biology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Examining the use of fecal pellet morphometry to differentiate age classes in Sonoran pronghorn
Published in
Wildlife Biology, September 2016
DOI 10.2981/wlb.00209
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 38%
Environmental Science 5 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 13 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2016.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Biology
#516
of 589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,792
of 348,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Biology
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.