↓ Skip to main content

The influence of the microenvironment on the malignant phenotype

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Medicine Today, August 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 105)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
8 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The influence of the microenvironment on the malignant phenotype
Published in
Molecular Medicine Today, August 2000
DOI 10.1016/s1357-4310(00)01756-1
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Normal tissue homeostasis is maintained by dynamic interactions between epithelial cells and their microenvironment. As tissue becomes cancerous, there are reciprocal interactions between neoplastic cells, adjacent normal cells such as stroma and endothelium, and their microenvironments. The current dominant paradigm wherein multiple genetic lesions provide both the impetus for, and the Achilles heel of, cancer might be inadequate to understand cancer as a disease process. In the following brief review, we will use selected examples to illustrate the influence of the microenvironment in the evolution of the malignant phenotype. We will also discuss recent studies that suggest novel therapeutic interventions might be derived from focusing on microenvironment and tumor cells interactions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 131 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 23%
Researcher 24 17%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 9%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 17 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 14%
Engineering 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 20 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,021,953
of 27,781,301 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Medicine Today
#3
of 105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,407
of 43,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Medicine Today
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,781,301 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them