You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Long-term stability of clopidogrel solid dispersions—Importance of in vitro dissolution test
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2022
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0266237 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ehlimana Osmanović Omerdić, Larisa Alagić-Džambić, Marko Krstić, Maja Pašić-Kulenović, Đorđe Medarević, Branka Ivković, Dragana Vasiljević |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
Other | 2 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 23% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 15% |
Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,926,266
of 23,479,361 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#48,415
of 201,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,248
of 443,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,433
of 4,612 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,479,361 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,612 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.