↓ Skip to main content

Association of Clinical Risk Factors and Postoperative Complications With Unplanned Hospital Readmission After Head and Neck Cancer Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Association of Clinical Risk Factors and Postoperative Complications With Unplanned Hospital Readmission After Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
Published in
JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, December 2016
DOI 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.2807
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Unplanned hospital readmission is costly and in recent years has become a focus of health care legislation intended to reduce health care expenditures. Greater understanding of which perioperative complications are associated with hospital readmission after surgery for head and neck cancer is needed to reduce unplanned readmissions. To determine which clinical risk factors and complications are associated with 30-day unplanned readmission after surgery for malignant neoplasms of the head and neck. This retrospective longitudinal claims analysis included data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2014. Patients undergoing surgery for malignant tumors of the head and neck were included; those with a primary diagnosis of thyroid malignant disease and those undergoing free autologous tissue transfer were excluded. Clinical risk factors and complications were analyzed for association with unplanned hospital readmission using multivariable regression analysis. Statistical significance was determined using P < .05. A total of 7605 patients (5007 men [65.8%]; mean [SD] age, 64.2 [0.2] years) were identified and included for analysis. Overall, 1472 complications occurred in 912 cases. Three hundred eighty-eight patients (5.1%) had an unplanned readmission, which was lower than the previously published overall readmission rate for noncardiac surgical procedures in the NSQIP (6.8%). Clinical factors that were independently associated with unplanned readmission were age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.22), diabetes (AOR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.01-2.43), preoperative dyspnea at rest (AOR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.40-5.55) and with moderate exertion (AOR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.01-2.11), long-term use of corticosteroids (AOR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.63-3.58), disseminated cancer (AOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.14-2.20), and a contaminated wound (AOR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.05-3.7). When specific complications were examined, superficial incisional surgical site infection (SSI) (AOR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.14-3.40), deep incisional SSI (AOR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.26-5.03), organ or space SSI (AOR, 13.27; 95% CI, 6.57-26.61), wound disruption (AOR, 3.58; 95% CI, 1.95-6.31), pneumonia (AOR, 3.39; 95% CI, 1.88-5.96), deep vein thrombosis (AOR, 5.60; 95% CI, 1.90-15.25), pulmonary embolism (AOR, 20.72; 95% CI, 7.86-55.68), urinary tract infection (AOR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.00-6.34), stroke (AOR, 12.42; 95% CI, 3.99-36.50), sepsis (AOR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.27-5.30), and septic shock (AOR, 4.12; 95% CI, 1.10-15.81) were all associated with 30-day unplanned hospital readmission. This study evaluated clinical factors and postoperative complications to determine which ones were associated with 30-day unplanned hospital readmission among patients undergoing surgery for malignant tumors of the head and neck. Further understanding of which complications are associated with unplanned readmission after head and neck surgery will allow for improved risk stratification and development of postoperative care protocols to reduce unplanned hospital readmission.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 107 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 35 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 37 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,707,086
of 27,376,552 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
#1,814
of 4,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,182
of 413,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
#29
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,376,552 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 413,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.