@waldenpod @AStrasser116 Have you read my wife's paper defending epiphenomenalism from the paradoxes of phenomenal judgment? Would be curious to hear your thoughts. Among other things, she argues that its implications for psychophysical (dis)harmony ac…
"no epistemic access to [qualia] at all" assumes an implicitly physicalist understanding of epistemic access. Epiphenomenalists can say much more internally-coherent things than that. See: https://t.co/67U41gfPhZ "Every debate about qualia hasn't been …
@LittleMammith You can read the 10,000 word answer here: https://t.co/7hpNwsz9pE But in a nutshell: my body would make the same sounds if no mental states existed at all. But that's missing an awful lot of what I actually have access to, i.e. my mind.
@pederskjelbred @RalphStefanWeir That sounds cool! In a similar vein, check out Helen's 'Dualism all the way down: why there is no paradox of phenomenal judgment' https://t.co/7hpNwsz9pE https://t.co/VClloCjwzC