↓ Skip to main content

589 Extracts from endemic plant Helichrysum zivojini suppress survival of malignant cells

Overview of attention for article published in EJC Supplements, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
589 Extracts from endemic plant Helichrysum zivojini suppress survival of malignant cells
Published in
EJC Supplements, June 2010
DOI 10.1016/s1359-6349(10)71390-2
Authors

I. Matic, Z. Juranic, Z. Zizak, V. Vajs, I. Aljancic, S. Milosavljevic

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from EJC Supplements
#102
of 397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,226
of 105,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJC Supplements
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 397 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them