↓ Skip to main content

Phylogeny of the weevil genus Rhinusa Stephens based on adult morphological characters and host plant information (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Overview of attention for article published in ZOOTAXA, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phylogeny of the weevil genus Rhinusa Stephens based on adult morphological characters and host plant information (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)
Published in
ZOOTAXA, September 2010
DOI 10.11646/zootaxa.2627.1.3
Authors

ROBERTO CALDARA, DAVIDE SASSI, IVO TOŠEVSKI

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 14%
United Kingdom 1 7%
Czechia 1 7%
Unknown 10 71%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 71%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2020.
All research outputs
#8,601,770
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from ZOOTAXA
#7,394
of 17,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,723
of 108,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ZOOTAXA
#4
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,681 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.