↓ Skip to main content

Neutron-encoded mass signatures for multiplexed proteome quantification

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
patent
12 patents
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Neutron-encoded mass signatures for multiplexed proteome quantification
Published in
Nature Methods, February 2013
DOI 10.1038/nmeth.2378
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We describe a protein quantification method called neutron encoding that exploits the subtle mass differences caused by nuclear binding energy variation in stable isotopes. These mass differences are synthetically encoded into amino acids and incorporated into yeast and mouse proteins via metabolic labeling. Mass spectrometry analysis with high mass resolution (>200,000) reveals the isotopologue-embedded peptide signals, permitting quantification. Neutron encoding will enable highly multiplexed proteome analysis with excellent dynamic range and accuracy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Netherlands 3 1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 206 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 64 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 28%
Student > Master 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 5%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 25 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 66 30%
Chemistry 34 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 30 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,493,618
of 28,840,878 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,839
of 5,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,140
of 213,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#19
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,840,878 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.