↓ Skip to main content

Heat Stress Standard ISO 7243 and its Global Application

Overview of attention for article published in Industrial Health, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
253 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
329 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Heat Stress Standard ISO 7243 and its Global Application
Published in
Industrial Health, January 2006
DOI 10.2486/indhealth.44.368
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ken Parsons

Abstract

This paper presents heat stress Standard ISO 7243, which is based upon the wet bulb globe temperature index (WBGT), and considers its suitability for use worldwide. The origins of the WBGT index are considered and how it is used in ISO 7243 and across the world as a simple index for monitoring and assessing hot environments. The standard (and index) has validity, reliability and usability. It is limited in application by consideration of estimating metabolic heat and the effects of clothing. Use of the standard also requires interpretation in terms of how it is used. Management systems, involving risk assessments, that take account of context and culture, are required to ensure successful use of the standard and global applicability. For use outdoors, a WBGT equation that includes solar absorptivity is recommended. A 'clothed WBGT' is proposed to account for the effects of clothing. It is concluded that as a simple assessment method, ISO 7243 has face validity and within limits is applicable worldwide.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 320 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 55 17%
Student > Master 54 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 16%
Student > Bachelor 30 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 60 18%
Unknown 56 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 88 27%
Environmental Science 57 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 28 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 5%
Sports and Recreations 11 3%
Other 56 17%
Unknown 71 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,892,288
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Industrial Health
#63
of 695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,098
of 154,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Industrial Health
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.