↓ Skip to main content

Total proximal hamstring ruptures: clinical and MRI aspects including guidelines for postoperative rehabilitation

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Total proximal hamstring ruptures: clinical and MRI aspects including guidelines for postoperative rehabilitation
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00167-012-2311-0
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The aim of this article is to provide a state-of-the-art review for treatment of acute, total proximal hamstring tendon ruptures. For total proximal hamstring tendon ruptures, early (<2-3 w) surgical refixation minimizes muscle atrophy and facilitates a somewhat predictable time course for healing and rehabilitation. A postoperative rehabilitation program is detailed that has been used by one physical therapist for the past 7 years on over 200 patients with surgical repair for total proximal hamstring tendon rupture. One re-rupture has occurred, 7 months after surgery, following the rehabilitation program described herein. The rehabilitation program, including avoidance of postoperative bracing, appears effective for total proximal hamstring ruptures. Early surgery together with a specific rehabilitation program appears to be the treatment of choice for timely and safe return to sport and an active lifestyle. Level of evidence V.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 160 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 14%
Other 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Researcher 11 7%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 49 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 25%
Sports and Recreations 36 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 55 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,425,026
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#999
of 2,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,836
of 278,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#20
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.