↓ Skip to main content

Effects of insufficient sleep on circadian rhythmicity and expression amplitude of the human blood transcriptome

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
801 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effects of insufficient sleep on circadian rhythmicity and expression amplitude of the human blood transcriptome
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2013
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1217154110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 404 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 801 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 10 1%
United Kingdom 10 1%
Germany 4 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Other 9 1%
Unknown 753 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 142 18%
Researcher 142 18%
Student > Bachelor 92 11%
Student > Master 76 9%
Other 41 5%
Other 142 18%
Unknown 166 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 176 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 107 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 92 11%
Neuroscience 54 7%
Psychology 39 5%
Other 119 15%
Unknown 214 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 898. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2026.
All research outputs
#24,580
of 34,782,165 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#693
of 119,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102
of 240,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#6
of 1,050 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,782,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119,667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,050 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.