↓ Skip to main content

Superiority illusion arises from resting-state brain networks modulated by dopamine

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
45 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
3 Redditors
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Superiority illusion arises from resting-state brain networks modulated by dopamine
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2013
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1221681110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 4 2%
France 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 178 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 17%
Student > Master 18 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 6%
Other 42 22%
Unknown 30 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 55 29%
Neuroscience 29 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 12%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 39 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2026.
All research outputs
#672,454
of 34,631,266 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#10,607
of 119,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,742
of 239,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#64
of 1,050 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,631,266 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,050 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.