↓ Skip to main content

Adverse outcomes associated with contact precautions: A review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Infection Control, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users
reddit
1 Redditor
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Adverse outcomes associated with contact precautions: A review of the literature
Published in
American Journal of Infection Control, March 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.04.257
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Contact Precautions (CP) are a standard method for preventing patient-to-patient transmission of multiple drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in hospital settings. With the ongoing worldwide concern for MDROs including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and broadened use of active surveillance programs, an increasing number of patients are being placed on CP. Whereas few would argue that CP are an important tool in infection control, many reports and small studies have observed worse noninfectious outcomes in patients on CP. However, no review of this literature exists.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 200 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 16%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Researcher 24 12%
Other 20 10%
Student > Postgraduate 20 10%
Other 46 22%
Unknown 39 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Psychology 8 4%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 48 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,312,296
of 33,226,737 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Infection Control
#373
of 5,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,251
of 142,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Infection Control
#7
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,226,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.