↓ Skip to main content

Preliminary Study of a Caregiver‐based Infant and Child Feeding and Swallowing Screening Tool

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Preliminary Study of a Caregiver‐based Infant and Child Feeding and Swallowing Screening Tool
Published in
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, June 2017
DOI 10.1097/mpg.0000000000001442
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The Infant and Child Feeding Questionnaire© (ICFQ©) was created to facilitate early detection of feeding and swallowing problems. This is achieved by promoting effective communication between caregivers and healthcare providers resulting in referral for evaluation and treatment of feeding and swallowing problems by specialists. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine whether items from the ICFQ© could be used to screen for differences between children with known (FP) and without known feeding problems (NFP). Caregivers of children 36 months of age or younger with FP and NFP were recruited to complete the ICFQ© and demographic questions. T-tests were completed to compare demographic characteristics of the research groups. Responses to ICFQ© items were analyzed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis and odds ratios to determine if questionnaire items distinguished between study groups. Sixty-four caregivers of children with FP and 57 caregivers of NFP children were recruited. Three participants in the NFP group did not meet inclusion criteria and were excluded from analysis. A combination of four ICFQ© questions distinguished between groups (ROC = .974). Significant odds ratios were also found for 9 feeding behaviors that distinguished between groups. A subset of items from the ICFQ© showed promise for distinguishing FP from NFP groups. Future work will expand the regional representation of the participant samples and obtain equal representation of participants across all age-adjusted questionnaires to determine whether the same combination of ICFQ

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 12%
Other 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 28 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 17%
Psychology 8 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 12%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Linguistics 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 32 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2017.
All research outputs
#3,026,673
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition
#602
of 7,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,726
of 365,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition
#9
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.