↓ Skip to main content

Clinical prediction rules for childhood urinary tract infections: a cross-sectional study in ambulatory care

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Clinical prediction rules for childhood urinary tract infections: a cross-sectional study in ambulatory care
Published in
BJGP Open, January 2022
DOI 10.3399/bjgpo.2021.0171
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanne Ann Boon, Jan Y Verbakel, Tine De Burghgraeve, Ann Van den Bruel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 44%
Unknown 5 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2022.
All research outputs
#8,013,965
of 24,356,663 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#390
of 573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,479
of 512,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#28
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,356,663 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 512,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.