↓ Skip to main content

多⾎⼩板⾎漿(PRP)療法を併⽤した運動療法にて症状の改善を認めた“吹き流し変形”を呈した⼀症例

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Musculoskeletal Physical Therapy, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
多⾎⼩板⾎漿(PRP)療法を併⽤した運動療法にて症状の改善を認めた“吹き流し変形”を呈した⼀症例
Published in
Journal of Musculoskeletal Physical Therapy, March 2022
DOI 10.57281/jofmpt.1.0_6
Authors

河原 常郎, 川⼝ 真, 磯⽥ ⼀将, 稲葉 佑, ⼩出 恵也, ⼭本 ⼀樹, 飯⽥ 修平, ⾦ 成道

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2022.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Musculoskeletal Physical Therapy
#6
of 12 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,612
of 464,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Musculoskeletal Physical Therapy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 464,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them