↓ Skip to main content

The binding of cholesterol and bile salts to recombinant rat liver fatty acid-binding protein

Overview of attention for article published in Biochemical Journal, December 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The binding of cholesterol and bile salts to recombinant rat liver fatty acid-binding protein
Published in
Biochemical Journal, December 1996
DOI 10.1042/bj3200729
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The physiological role of liver fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP) has yet to be clarified. An important feature of this member of the family of intracellular lipid-binding proteins is the wide range of compounds that have been identified as potential physiological ligands. By using recombinant L-FABP, the binding of cholesterol, bile salts and their derivatives has been investigated under conditions that allow a direct comparison of the binding affinities of these ligands for fatty acids. The results demonstrate an inability of L-FABP to bind cholesterol, although the anionic derivative, cholesteryl sulphate, will bind under similar assay conditions. Of the bile salts examined, lithocholate and taurolithocholate sulphate showed the greatest binding to L-FABP. It is proposed that an important function of L-FABP is to bind certain physiological amphipathic anions, thus preventing the "free' concentrations of these compounds from exceeding their critical micelle concentration, which could result in cell damage.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Chemistry 2 8%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,489,401
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Biochemical Journal
#3,490
of 11,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,744
of 91,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemical Journal
#29
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,414 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.